Description
Digital signatures were introduced to guarantee the authenticity and integrity of the underlying messages. However, and in situations where the signed data is commercially or personally sensitive, the universal verification of digital signatures is undesirable, and needs to be limited or controlled. Therefore, mechanisms which share most properties with digital signatures except the universal verification were invented to respond to the aforementioned need; we call such mechanisms ``opaque signatures''. In this talk, we study confirmer signatures where the verification cannot be achieved without the cooperation of a specific entity, i.e. the confirmer, via the so-called confirmation/denial protocols. Generic constructions of designated confirmer signatures follow one of the following two strategies; either produce a digital signature on the message to be signed, then encrypt the resulting signature, or produce a commitment on the message, encrypt the string used to generate the commitment, and finally sign the latter. In this talk, we revisit both methods and establish the minimal and sufficient assumptions on the building blocks in order to attain secure confirmer signatures. Our study concludes that both paradigms, when used in their basic form, cannot allow a class of encryption schemes which is vital for the efficiency of the confirmation/denial protocols. Next, we propose a variation of both paradigms which thrives on very cheap encryption and consequently leads to efficient confirmer signatures. Indeed, the resulting constructions do not only compete with the dedicated realizations of confirmer/undeniable signatures proposed recently, e.g. \citep{LeTrieuKurosawaOgata2009b,SchuldtMatsuura2010}, but also serve for analyzing the early schemes that have a speculative security.<br/> The contents of this talk are parts of the speaker's PhD thesis.
Next sessions
-
Attacks and Remedies for Randomness in AI: Cryptanalysis of PHILOX and THREEFRY
Speaker : Yevhen Perehuda - Ruhr-University Bochum
In this work, we address the critical yet understudied question of the security of the most widely deployed pseudorandom number generators (PRNGs) in AI applications. We show that these generators are vulnerable to practical and low-cost attacks. With this in mind, we conduct an extensive survey of randomness usage in current applications to understand the efficiency requirements imposed in[…]-
Cryptography
-
-
Lightweight (AND, XOR) Implementations of Large-Degree S-boxes
Speaker : Marie Bolzer - LORIA
The problem of finding a minimal circuit to implement a given function is one of the oldest in electronics. In cryptography, the focus is on small functions, especially on S-boxes which are classically the only non-linear functions in iterated block ciphers. In this work, we propose new ad-hoc automatic tools to look for lightweight implementations of non-linear functions on up to 5 variables for[…]-
Cryptography
-
Symmetrical primitive
-
Implementation of cryptographic algorithm
-
-
Algorithms for post-quantum commutative group actions
Speaker : Marc Houben - Inria Bordeaux
At the historical foundation of isogeny-based cryptography lies a scheme known as CRS; a key exchange protocol based on class group actions on elliptic curves. Along with more efficient variants, such as CSIDH, this framework has emerged as a powerful building block for the construction of advanced post-quantum cryptographic primitives. Unfortunately, all protocols in this line of work are[…] -
Endomorphisms via Splittings
Speaker : Min-Yi Shen - No Affiliation
One of the fundamental hardness assumptions underlying isogeny-based cryptography is the problem of finding a non-trivial endomorphism of a given supersingular elliptic curve. In this talk, we show that the problem is related to the problem of finding a splitting of a principally polarised superspecial abelian surface. In particular, we provide formal security reductions and a proof-of-concept[…]-
Cryptography
-