Description
The Polynomial Modular Number System (PMNS) is an integer number system which aims to speed up arithmetic operations modulo a prime p. Such a system is defined by a tuple (p, n, g, r, E), where p, n, g and r are positive integers, E is a monic polynomial with integer coefficients, having g as a root modulo p. Most of the work done on PMNS focus on polynomials E such that E(X) = X^n – l, where l is a nonzero integer, because such a polynomial provides efficiency and low memory cost, in particular for l = 2 or -2.<br/> It however appeared that these are not always the best choices. In this presentation, we first start with the necessary background on PMNS. Then, we highlight a new set of polynomials E for very efficient operations in the PMNS and low memory requirement, along with new bounds and parameters. We show that these polynomials are more interesting than (most) polynomials E(X)=X^n – l. To finish, we see how to use PMNS to randomise arithmetic operations in order to randomise high level operations like elliptic curve scalar multiplication, to protect implementations against some advanced side channel attacks like differential power analysis (DPA).<br/> Joint work with Jean-Marc Robert and Pascal Véron<br/> lien: https://seminaire-c2.inria.fr/
Next sessions
-
Wagner’s Algorithm Provably Runs in Subexponential Time for SIS^∞
Speaker : Johanna Loyer - Inria Saclay
At CRYPTO 2015, Kirchner and Fouque claimed that a carefully tuned variant of the Blum-Kalai-Wasserman (BKW) algorithm (JACM 2003) should solve the Learning with Errors problem (LWE) in slightly subexponential time for modulus q = poly(n) and narrow error distribution, when given enough LWE samples. Taking a modular view, one may regard BKW as a combination of Wagner’s algorithm (CRYPTO 2002), run[…]-
Cryptography
-
-
CryptoVerif: a computationally-sound security protocol verifier
Speaker : Bruno Blanchet - Inria
CryptoVerif is a security protocol verifier sound in the computational model of cryptography. It produces proofs by sequences of games, like those done manually by cryptographers. It has an automatic proof strategy and can also be guided by the user. It provides a generic method for specifying security assumptions on many cryptographic primitives, and can prove secrecy, authentication, and[…]-
Cryptography
-
-
Structured-Seed Local Pseudorandom Generators and their Applications
Speaker : Nikolas Melissaris - IRIF
We introduce structured‑seed local pseudorandom generators (SSL-PRGs), pseudorandom generators whose seed is drawn from an efficiently sampleable, structured distribution rather than uniformly. This seemingly modest relaxation turns out to capture many known applications of local PRGs, yet it can be realized from a broader family of hardness assumptions. Our main technical contribution is a[…]-
Cryptography
-
-
Predicting Module-Lattice Reduction
Speaker : Paola de Perthuis - CWI
Is module-lattice reduction better than unstructured lattice reduction? This question was highlighted as `Q8' in the Kyber NIST standardization submission (Avanzi et al., 2021), as potentially affecting the concrete security of Kyber and other module-lattice-based schemes. Foundational works on module-lattice reduction (Lee, Pellet-Mary, Stehlé, and Wallet, ASIACRYPT 2019; Mukherjee and Stephens[…]-
Cryptography
-